| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <55F29CF2.1010600@thorsheim.net> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:20:50 +0200 From: Per Thorsheim <per@...rsheim.net> To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net Subject: Re: [PHC] CynoPrime finds AM src.code flaws, AND YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENS NEXT Well, my post still holds, on the fact that having an account with AM doesn't prove anything "illegal" by itself. Unless of course having an unverififed account with a dating service by itself is morally wrong. Legally its not afaik. The amount of passwords cracked by @CynoPrime however, and their current estimates says they will crack 90-95% of all the passwords - for all accounts, I have no doubt AM have completely FUBAR their password storage implementation. .per Den 11.09.2015 10:41, skrev Christian Heinrich: > Per, > > To be fair MD5AM and MD5AM2 were deprecated as legacy. > > Would it be reasonable to assume that this sample of accounts are > within the scope of your post at > https://grahamcluley.com/2015/07/ashley-madison-fake/ ? > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Per Thorsheim <per@...rsheim.net> wrote: >> Clickbait subject and perhaps way off-topic for this list, but the work >> done by @CynoPrime in this case is impressive to me, and serves as a >> very important reminder on who should, and who should not be allowed to >> implement crypto & password storage into any systems. >> >> http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/09/once-seen-as-bulletproof-11-million-ashley-madison-passwords-already-cracked/ >> >> BR, >> Per Thorsheim >> PasswordsCon.org > > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists