lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:20:50 +0200
From: Per Thorsheim <per@...rsheim.net>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] CynoPrime finds AM src.code flaws, AND YOU KNOW WHAT
 HAPPENS NEXT

Well, my post still holds, on the fact that having an account with AM
doesn't prove anything "illegal" by itself. Unless of course having an
unverififed account with a dating service by itself is morally wrong.
Legally its not afaik.

The amount of passwords cracked by @CynoPrime however, and their current
estimates says they will crack 90-95% of all the passwords - for all
accounts, I have no doubt AM have completely FUBAR their password
storage implementation.

.per



Den 11.09.2015 10:41, skrev Christian Heinrich:
> Per,
> 
> To be fair MD5AM and MD5AM2 were deprecated as legacy.
> 
> Would it be reasonable to assume that this sample of accounts are
> within the scope of your post at
> https://grahamcluley.com/2015/07/ashley-madison-fake/ ?
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Per Thorsheim <per@...rsheim.net> wrote:
>> Clickbait subject and perhaps way off-topic for this list, but the work
>> done by @CynoPrime in this case is impressive to me, and serves as a
>> very important reminder on who should, and who should not be allowed to
>> implement crypto & password storage into any systems.
>>
>> http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/09/once-seen-as-bulletproof-11-million-ashley-madison-passwords-already-cracked/
>>
>> BR,
>> Per Thorsheim
>> PasswordsCon.org
> 
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists