phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] CynoPrime finds AM src.code flaws, AND YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENS NEXT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <127307938-964@skroderider.denisbider.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:04:36 +0100
From: denis bider <pwhashing@...isbider.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] CynoPrime finds AM src.code flaws, AND YOU KNOW WHAT
 HAPPENS NEXT

Off-topic, but related and interesting:

Though probably not prosecuted very often, adultery is a felony in several US states:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adultery#/media/File:Adultery_Statutes_1996.png

In Wisconsin, for example, both the adulterer, and the person with whom the adulterer adults, are liable for a class I felony, punishable by fines of up to $10,000, and prison terms of up to 3.5 years:

http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/944.pdf

http://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/wisconsin-felony-crimes-class-and-sentences.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adultery#/media/File:U.S._Adultery_Statutes,_1996.png

I find this backwards, and an infringement on the rights of swingers and people in open relationships (the law appears to contain no exception for this). It's also an outrageous hammer that can be used to selectively hit people with (especially given the consequences of landing a felony).

But there you go.

-----Original Message----- 
From: Per Thorsheim 
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 03:20 
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net 
Subject: Re: [PHC] CynoPrime finds AM src.code flaws, AND YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENS NEXT 

Well, my post still holds, on the fact that having an account with AM
doesn't prove anything "illegal" by itself. Unless of course having an
unverififed account with a dating service by itself is morally wrong.
Legally its not afaik.

The amount of passwords cracked by @CynoPrime however, and their current
estimates says they will crack 90-95% of all the passwords - for all
accounts, I have no doubt AM have completely FUBAR their password
storage implementation.

.per

Den 11.09.2015 10:41, skrev Christian Heinrich:
> Per,
> 
> To be fair MD5AM and MD5AM2 were deprecated as legacy.
> 
> Would it be reasonable to assume that this sample of accounts are
> within the scope of your post at
> https://grahamcluley.com/2015/07/ashley-madison-fake/ ?
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Per Thorsheim <per@...rsheim.net> wrote:
>> Clickbait subject and perhaps way off-topic for this list, but the work
>> done by @CynoPrime in this case is impressive to me, and serves as a
>> very important reminder on who should, and who should not be allowed to
>> implement crypto & password storage into any systems.
>>
>> http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/09/once-seen-as-bulletproof-11-million-ashley-madison-passwords-already-cracked/
>>
>> BR,
>> Per Thorsheim
>> PasswordsCon.org
> 
> 
> 

Content of type "text/html" skipped