phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Interest in specification of modular crypt format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:25:13 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Interest in specification of modular crypt format

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 05:06:00AM +0300, Solar Designer wrote:
> char *encode64_uint32(char *dst, size_t dstlen, uint32_t src);
> const char *decode64_uint32(uint32_t *dst, const char *src);
> 
> encode64_uint32() encodes the number in src into the string pointed to
> by dst, and returns a pointer to right after the encoded number.
> 
> decode64_uint32() decodes the number in the string src into dst, and
> returns a pointer to right after the encoded number.

The intent is that we can easily call these functions multiple times in
a row, to encode/decode multiple numbers.

> As you can see, the encoding/decoding functions are quite simple.

Attached is a slightly shorter version: I removed the "base" variable,
and instead update src or *dst (when encoding or decoding) directly.
Perhaps this can be shortened further, but this wouldn't necessarily
make it simpler.

> gcc sim-encode.c -o sim-encode -s -O2 -march=native -fopenmp -Wall && ./sim-encode

Alexander

View attachment "sim-encode.c" of type "text/x-c" (4697 bytes)