phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Asymmetric proof-of-work based on the Generalized Birthday problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMtf1HtfTeuv1T1dfhQMdTFtd9TJyzszrq+QTG7w0QPNbCHkHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:40:08 +1000
From: Ben Harris <mail@...rr.is>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] Asymmetric proof-of-work based on the Generalized Birthday problem

On 29 September 2015 at 19:28, Dmitry Khovratovich <khovratovich@...il.com>
wrote:

>  For example, the proof for 700-MB memory is 148 bytes long. The
> implementation exists but is not optimized.
>
>
Looks awesome. Did you consider including the actual run-time in Table I?
I'm curious how the run-time varies with n for semi-constant T(n, k).

Content of type "text/html" skipped