phc-discussions - RE: [PHC] Specification of a modular crypt format (2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B22443@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:18:28 +0000
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@...auckland.ac.nz>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: RE: [PHC] Specification of a modular crypt format (2)

Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> writes:

>That's true, and your code works, but I gave strtoul() a try anyway.

It has the same problem as atol(), it uses in-band signalling for errors
(which means, at least for my purposes, that I consider it unusable).  Thomas'
version (and mine) don't.

Peter.