lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:21:35 +0300
From: Solar Designer <>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Specification of a modular crypt format (2)

On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:06:59AM +0200, Kriszti??n Pint??r wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Solar Designer <> wrote:
> >> I'm pretty sure any aggressive enough compiler will do these. Cf.
> > Curiously, for all compilers currently available on
> i'm pretty sure that all the discussion about current compilers are
> totally irrelevant if you plan to deliver standards for the upcoming
> decades.

The discussion about current compilers is relevant in that even current
compilers already effectively disallow use of those broken constructions,
in case anyone still was not convinced.  So they work to prove a point.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists