phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] Argon2 code in C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGiyFddcBe9mxmpVA2GQPx5M0Dv-mwn9vQQmuieb=-mBvW5aYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 09:55:16 +0000
From: Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>
To: "discussions@...sword-hashing.net" <discussions@...sword-hashing.net>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Argon2 code in C

Any volunteer to create an autoconf script?

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:51 AM Jean-Philippe Aumasson <
jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com> wrote:

> Great, thanks!
>
> The return values of pthread_join() are collected but not checked, choose
> one :)
>
> There's still the clang bug that was reported privately.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:07 AM Dmitry Khovratovich <
> khovratovich@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> we have finished porting the Argon2 code to C99 (
>> https://github.com/khovratovich/Argon2/tree/master/Source/C99 ) , so
>> everyone who wants to play with it in the C-only environment is welcome.
>> The multithreading is implemented with pthreads, but performance is not
>> quite satisfactory (slower than the C++11 code). We'll try also with OpenMP
>> and report how it goes. The folder structure has been changed as well to
>> accomodate future implementations. The C99 implementation also comes in the
>> reference and optimized version (make OPT=TRUE), though the difference is
>> not significant (multithreading is implemented in the code shared by them).
>>
>> Testing against test vectors has been automatized, you can now run "make
>> check-tv" from either C99 or C++11 folders.
>>
>> We plan to allow up to 2^32 threads and separate them from lanes in the
>> next update, hopefully this week.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Dmitry, Daniel
>>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped