lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 09:08:31 -0400
From: Richard Outerbridge <>
Subject: Re: [PHC] Specification of a modular crypt format (2)

On 2015-10-09 (282), at 08:38:26, Alexander Cherepanov <> wrote:
> On 2015-10-09 15:18, Thomas Pornin wrote:
>>>> 		acc = (acc << 6) + (unsigned)d;
>>> ...but this one seems entirely redundant:-)
>> This cast is for readability. Readability depends on who is doing the
>> reading, and, in this case, the cast is for me.  [….]
> Sure. But in this case, there is no switching of signedness, both operands have "unsigned" type. Sorry, I don't see what an additional cast could achieve.

What could it possibly co$t?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists