| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: smcmahon at eiv.com (Shawn McMahon) Subject: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 02:57:44PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu said: > > (Personally, I use PGP because the whole IETF/NANOG/security community is > fairly small and closed (perhaps 10K people, tops?), and PGP is a better fit > than X.509, which is which is designed for hundreds of millions of users that > you've never heard of before, and will never hear from again). I use both, depending on to whom I'm sending the email, but I use PGP by default. -- Shawn McMahon | Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, EIV Consulting | that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any UNIX and Linux | hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure http://www.eiv.com| the survival and the success of liberty. - JFK -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030509/3e29ae38/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists