full-disclosure - Verisign "responds"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: jonathan at nuclearelephant.com (Jonathan A. Zdziarski)
Subject: Verisign "responds"

On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 21:25, Macroscape Solutions wrote:
> I think to be fare to Verisign and the other registrar's they at least
> should have links to GoDaddy and the likes to register the nonexistent
> domain. They should spread the wealth....if they won't suspend the service.

To be "fair" to everyone, the community should be in control of the
top-level domains, and not commercial organizations - nobody ever
expected the Internet to grow so huge (not even Al Gore).  So initially
having a government-run agency was a good temporary solution, but now
that everything is commercialized, we need to fix what's broken...and
what's broken is the monopoly on TLDs.