full-disclosure - Dig SCO?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: dietz at dimecs.de (dietz@...ecs.de)
Subject: Dig SCO?

On 02.02.2004 at 14:00:17, Robert Guess <rguess@....net> wrote:

> I don't 
> feel sorry for SCO but I cannot see any way for this "virus" to benefit 
> the open source or free software communities.

What if someone exactly wants to archive this? 

In the current situation with SCO vs. IBM it would be easy for SCO to release a
virus against themselves and blaim it on the open source community. Wouldn't
even surprise me. And a not knoledgable judge would even recognize it as
evidence against the Open Source community.

Welcome to the information warfare.

ciao

Sebastian