full-disclosure - PIX vs CheckPoint

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: John.Airey at rnib.org.uk (John.Airey@...b.org.uk)
Subject: PIX vs CheckPoint

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary E. Miller [mailto:gem@...lim.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 30 June 2004 00:58
> To: Eric Paynter
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Yo Eric!
> 
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Eric Paynter wrote:
> 
> > Once the
> > administrators had finished their Cisco training, they said 
> they would
> > never go back to FW-1 because the PIX interface was so much 
> easier to use.
> 
> I agree, except for one small problem.  Don't you still have to delete
> ALL the filter rules, and reenter them ALL to change the order of the
> rules? last I checked there was no "insert before", "insert 
> at top" sort
> of options.  Just "insert at end".  This and other features can really
> slow down the otherwise decent CLI.
> 
No longer true. The latest versions of the PIX CLI allow you to specify
which line numbers, so you can insert rules where you want.

> Another bad thing about the PIX CLI is that is looks a lot 
> like the IOS CLI,
> but has lots of subtle differences that will byte you when 
> you least expect
> it.
> 
Can you name one? I find it a pain the other way round, like not being able
to "write mem" when in configuration.

-- 
John Airey, BSc (Jt Hons), CNA, RHCE
Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute of the
Blind,
Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU,
Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 John.Airey@...b.org.uk 

I don't know which is worse. The makers of soap operas thinking they portray
real life or those that watch them thinking it is real life!

-- 
DISCLAIMER: 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system. 

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by 
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. 

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
those of RNIB. 

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk