| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: gem at rellim.com (Gary E. Miller) Subject: PIX vs CheckPoint -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yo John! On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 John.Airey@...b.org.uk wrote: > > I agree, except for one small problem. Don't you still have to delete > > ALL the filter rules, and reenter them ALL to change the order of the > > rules? last I checked there was no "insert before", "insert > > at top" sort > > of options. Just "insert at end". This and other features can really > > slow down the otherwise decent CLI. > > > No longer true. The latest versions of the PIX CLI allow you to specify > which line numbers, so you can insert rules where you want. Gee, only took until version 6.2 to add a feature any firewall guru knows is a basic requirement? > > like the IOS CLI, > > but has lots of subtle differences that will byte you when > > you least expect > > it. > > > Can you name one? I find it a pain the other way round, like not being able > to "write mem" when in configuration. That one will do. Not used a PIX in 3 years so my memory iis weak. Not actually backing up your config to NVRAM could have pretty interesting consequences. RGDS GARY - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701 gem@...lim.com Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA5E/Y8KZibdeR3qURAtMbAJ0XCFnGPu6sZv7Wq0WQqrEZLkjIYgCfbbxy 1biUG15cGEnRMMo29fX45AI= =0+MA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists