| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: yossarian at planet.nl (yossarian) Subject: Full-Disclosure Posts Well, if it were a list for security professionals - with a consensus on what security was and with a shared view how to look and act professional - maybe. But then again, many people here would probably not qualify as security pro in the economic sense - they are not employed in security per s?, whilst many people so employed are ignorant of this list and the likes. They sell firewalls in a box or ISO cretfication advice. Nanog on the other hand is a list for people that might actually meet in jobrelated ways. FD isn't, it is more for the vulnerability-inclined, while most security pro's I meet are procedure minded. I have yet to meet a security officer that could actually grasp a sniffer trace or an auditor that could read code.... And as far as security consultants go - well, ah, there are some good ones, i guess. But maybe we could do a poll here: what job pays your bills. My guess would be many sysadmins and proggers. But not to worry, I can act professional myself, like wear a tie - if someone could mail the link tothe manual on how to do the double windsor .... ----- Original Message ----- From: "yahoo@...alhost" <xploitable@...il.com> To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 12:15 AM Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Full-Disclosure Posts > Should Full-Disclosure only allow so-called -real- names? I was on<BR> > Nanog (a network admin list) and they have a rule where you can only<BR> > post with a first and second name, instead of an alias or nick, to<BR> > kind of give more credibility that you are a security professional and<BR> > not a hax0r or script kiddie.<BR> > <BR> > Should the same rule be pro actively implemented to Full-Disclosure or<BR> > is it a dead duck idea?<BR> > <BR> > I know hax0rs or script kiddies would probably use fake first and<BR> > second names if it was implemented, but at least the list would look<BR> > neat and a tad more professional?<BR> > <BR> > Feedback welcomed....<BR> > <BR> > _______________________________________________<BR> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.<BR> > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists