full-disclosure - Re: Evidence Mounts that the Vote Was Hacked

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: kluge at blackroses.com (Kluge)
Subject: Re: Evidence Mounts that the Vote Was Hacked

On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Jei wrote:

> Arguing that vote discrepancies don't really matter, is like a system admin 
> arguing that system binary checksum discrepancies do not matter.

But binary checksums don't have electoral colleges... so discrepancies DO 
matter.. unlike the votes we little taxpayers get to cast every 4 years in 
the US...

> In any case, it means you're royally f*cked, and although you may wish
> to fantasize otherwise, it doesn't change the reality.

Ayep, the poor stay poor, and the rich stay politicians...

> You need to know that you're secure, or your security people aren't
> doing their job.

;) Well, your security people could also be lying through their teeth...

-kluge