lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer) Subject: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. * Paul Schmehl: > --On Monday, November 15, 2004 05:18:16 PM +0100 Florian Weimer > <fw@...eb.enyo.de> wrote: >> >> The problem isn't so much the weighting (it's even more extreme in the >> senate), but the "the winner gets it all" principle adopted in most >> states. This means that both election campaigns do not care a bit >> about states like Texas where a ten percent swing in one direction or >> the other simply has no net result. > > <http://www.sbe.state.va.us/Election/Electoral_College.htm> > <http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_elec.html> > <http://www.spies.com/Forums/showthread.php?threadid=404> And what's your point?