lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu Mar 24 07:15:26 2005
From: devdas at dvb.homelinux.org (Devdas Bhagat)
Subject: Re: [ISN] How To Save The Internet

On 23/03/05 13:51 -0600, Ben Vaisvil wrote:
> The truth is most people are not "skilled" enough to operate their PC's
> at a level that isn't "dangerous" to the rest of the network/internet.

This is a result of the fact that pseudo Turing machines like computers
are more complex than most people understand.

> Nor should they have to be. With better operating system and software
> design we can mitigate those risks, but never eliminate them. There is
> no one simple solution to a security problem - it always a 
> process. The problem often lies that the default configuration for
> software and OS's are inherently insecure, allowing problems to propagate.

Default configuration for software? Other than Windows, which consumer
oriented OS is inherently insecure? MacOS X, Linux variants, *BSD?

> No normal computer user should be expected to become a system
> administrator for their computer. Design is what has let us 
> down - the fact I have be active to protect my computer is the problem.
> 
The alternative is a locked down system which will not do everything
your computer can do. These are better known as appliances, and have
been rejected by the market till date.

The "normal" computer user wants powerful and flexible systems.
The price of power is responsibility.

Devdas Bhagat

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ