full-disclosure - Defeating Microsoft WGA Validation Check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed Jul 27 18:28:31 2005
From: mail at hackingspirits.com (Debasis Mohanty)
Subject: Defeating Microsoft WGA Validation Check 

>> hi, I came across your site from the article at  <http://www.vnunet.com/>
www.vnunet.com about this validation workaround. I just have a question,
will this workaround work with Microsoft 
>> Windows Update site? 

I never tested it for Windows Update. However, as per M$ recent statement
windows update will work irrespective of the OS being genuine or not. The
test that I conducted was purely done for those Microsoft tools / products
available on the M$ download centre which installs only on a genuine copy of
Windows. 

>> No where in the article or on your workaround instructions mentions how
this could also work with Windows Update site. Or I could have missed it or
something, 
>> could this check work with W2K as well? 

FYI: Microsoft has fixed this issue immediately after few days of the
workaround was released. So the workaround might not work for any of the
current downloads from M$ download centre. Bad Luck ... ;o) 

There are still ways to circumvent WGA, I am currently working on it but
can't comment anything at this point of time. 

Debasis Mohanty
www.hackingspirits.com 

  _____  

From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of goosee007
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:50 AM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Defeating Microsoft WGA Validation Check 

hi, I came across your site from the article at www.vnunet.com about this
validation workaround. I just have a question, will this workaround work
with Microsoft Windows Update site? 

No where in the article or on your workaround instructions mentions how this
could also work with Windows Update site. Or I could have missed it or
something, could this check work with W2K as well? 

thanks goose
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050727/4fe00670/attachment.html