full-disclosure - Off topic. To the list Admins or anyone that can help me

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat Aug 20 06:41:48 2005
From: measl at mfn.org (J.A. Terranson)
Subject: Off topic. To the list Admins or anyone that
	can help me


On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, waldo alvarez wrote:

> Hi Folks:
>
> I'm just landed here recently because of an e-mail in bugtrack. You
> know curiosity can take you to strange places. And jejej this list is
> great. Non moderation simply makes it great. Now the problem is. I
> sort mail arriving to my mailbox by category using filters. Now the
> only common thing that applies to all mails here is the
> [Full-disclosure] text in the subject. Everything else is a caos. The
> from fields sometimes don't have the fulldisclosure address. And on
> the other side I tried to sort using that text in the subject but it
> doesn't work at all sometimes messages land in the Fulldiclosure
> folder I have for this list but sometimes they land straigth into my
> inbox. And there is a total caos having so much traffic this list.
> Could anybody that solved this before gimme a hand telling me the
> solution for this. In any case I think this list should work in that
> sense like the rest of the lists.


Dear Waldo,

	Thank you for taking the time to fully disclose your email list
administration 0-day.  Now would you please call your local help desk to
ask how you should configure your goddamned mail filter?

Thanks.

-- 
Yours,

J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@....org
0xBD4A95BF


I like the idea of belief in drug-prohibition as a religion in that it is
a strongly held belief based on grossly insufficient evidence and
bolstered by faith born of intuitions flowing from the very beliefs they
are intended to support.

don zweig, M.D.