lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed Dec  7 22:17:09 2005
From: c0ntexb at gmail.com (c0ntex)
Subject: Re: Google is vulnerable from XSS attack

For what it is worth, it would be trivial right now to name 10 very
large online presences that have some form of vulnerability, whether
that is XXS, SQL Injection or some other form of web application
quirkiness, it's not really a big deal.

I do how ever have to agree with ad, it takes far more skill, patience
and devotion to develop some form of code based exploit, by either
controlling a chunk of memory or a vital register which in the end
yields some form of malicious process control than it does to pop an
html, java script or sql string/statement in to a field or other input
area.

On 07/12/05, ad@...poverflow.com <ad@...poverflow.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> where is your heap overflow ?? (XSS easy targets) ;>
>
> n3td3v wrote:
> > Hackers own Google while vulnerabilities remain unpatched. Once they
> > patch a vulnerability, they can own me again! Until then... Google is
> > in the hands of hackers.
> >
> > Since you're having a stab at me. Wheres your Google and Yahoo
> > vulnerabilities? Naw, you don't have any. You prefer to go looking for
> > your SQL injections and cross site scripting in web sites no one has
> > ever heard of or cared about before (easy targets).
> >
> > As the score goes, how many high profile brand names have you found
> > vulnerabilities for?
> >
> > Fancy having a hacking challenge for finding vulnerabilities in major dot-com's?
> >
> > Lets do it!
> >
> > On 12/7/05, Morning Wood <se_cur_ity@...mail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>who owns you? hint: Google ( they own the world )
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
> >
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
>
> iQIVAwUBQ5dYr6+LRXunxpxfAQImGRAAj0gfdT3D3Y5XS5H4iIDujA3l8fCXah0F
> vOxvmPWSFgIvicoNTITrX/MNCqnFXhR5tpbk3m4gUsfb+i4VHoEiNy/GcT3XB2VY
> ZDSqA3lso3kNH9g+LrVMkI9TnLLKJxicbiJRNFusCQcKECDivipuU/hdMiWM/M2j
> h+Uh9bCrl5cWFRcsj8WZDeOZu2jtR4lsh96zdkZAQ+IT9M+auwRAoi9KUvcVuyCO
> 8zoFPmLUsecMU0fc7IeTtODZrhgR9IDQ0kqfRGJpuyR97du7TZrFs+yqzgMn9C2E
> AU+5b3B51Mi62yGpAvXf89nboMoNOoHNdsd2XhuY36VtRoNeuv0PGDIpB5uxlq+v
> OezZ9JcBeWYzxXvwlLB4rSlcsN77uR9DoPvx/bCHQLXd2O/1w01/D5PZw3VUHvxJ
> p7v1FRPBGshqG53RkATbZFKwCyZebYTWbY4E/8hOne1m+wH9hZEk6TVfKwtOmFwE
> /z5vO2jgULeTTKMOrDWQyaiRRC2Kz5iN7BLTBLOVU2nWTPkY2l06dQoo9xXQ/fnS
> MmIyzIYbA+Yc17rddxuRM3TCJ7OBbETQkuOBIFNlTRg2UwnzXskAhxD2H9Qyc9hu
> CPWTQ6IEbB6jMTP18WChzYr5yk475bYLxghdIktvMteCgAB1Q0FxL/bhuVRf8Ipv
> v4guvZNJVhs=
> =wspa
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>


--

regards
c0ntex

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ