full-disclosure - Open Letter on the Interpretation of "Vulnerability Statistics"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri Jan  6 19:35:04 2006
From: guninski at guninski.com (Georgi Guninski)
Subject: Open Letter on the Interpretation of
	"Vulnerability Statistics"

On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:12:32AM -0500, Steven M. Christey wrote:
> 
> Open Letter on the Interpretation of "Vulnerability Statistics"
> ---------------------------------------------------------------

>Refined Vulnerability Information (RVI)

hahaha, buzz word?

>that is vulnerability databases (including CVE/NVD)

hahaha:
http://cve.mitre.org/about/
A Dictionary, NOT a Database
(note the CAPS)
so which way is it "NOT" or "A database"?

rumors says the bsa/*aa may be after you for copyright infringment and
illegal reverse engineering. irresponsible of you, bad dog!

> RVI sources collect unstructured vulnerability information from Raw
> Sources. 

read: parasites cut and paste from people who can do things.

> - LACK OF COMPLETE CROSS-REFERENCING BETWEEN RVI SOURCES.

read: coley does not like it that there is no officially recognized 
usa funded database (NOT a dictionary) to rule em all and manipulate
statistics.

-- 
where do you want bill gates to go today?