full-disclosure - Re: Signal to Noise Ratio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:14:42 -0400
From: "Joey Mengele" <joey.mengele@...hmail.com>
To: <jason@...lerinterviews.com>,<3apa3a@...urity.nnov.ru>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Signal to Noise Ratio

This is an English speaking list. Please translate.

Grow up.

J

On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:07:15 -0400 3APA3A <3APA3A@...URITY.NNOV.RU> 
wrote:
>Dear jason@...lerinterviews.com,
>
>--Tuesday, July 24, 2007, 5:02:16 PM, you wrote to full-
>disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk:
>
>jkc>   It seems to me the average SNR here could be greatly 
>improved with any
>jkc> one of several commonly available "community-based" filtering
>jkc> mechanisms.  Digg and Slashdot are both examples of what I'm 
>suggesting.
>
>This  subject  arises  here  twice  an  year.  List needs 
>_professional_
>moderation, like Bugtraq has. because:
>
>1.  Next  thing  to  research  will  be  attacks against community-
>based
>filtering mechanisms.
>
>2.  No, thanks, see enough "community moderators" things with 
>Wikipedia,
>where  sense  of  good always hits common sense. It's well known 
>who has
>high  desire  to moderate: not a professional with deep topic 
>knowledge.
>Michael   Zalewski  was  filtered  from  "hackers"  for  few  
>years  for
>self-promotion  (Was  it  Stallman  who  edited  this article or 
>15-year
>schoolboy  who  read nothing but few articles about... let me 
>remember..
>Melissa  worm?). Bad for you, Michael, you promote yourself again! 
>I was
>not  able  to  add article about free open source software, as I 
>am only
>listed software developer (I really am): it's promotion. Just 
>wonder: if
>somebody  looks for specific software in Wikipedia, is it better 
>to have
>potentially  promotional  article  from  it's  developer  or do 
>not have
>article at all?
>
>
>-- 
>~/ZARAZA http://securityvulns.com/
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

--
HASH(0x8be1f18)
HASH(0x8be1b7c)
http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4d80lgEQMbVvsFVcKkzEfbdfzp47Z5fwJxDQcDnCBZDZBYvu/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/