lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 22:03:46 +0000
From: n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>
To: "j-f sentier" <j.sentiar@...il.com>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: More proof that Microsoft products are
	probably backdoored

There are no kiddies on the group and any that appear get banned.

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:28 PM, j-f sentier <j.sentiar@...il.com> wrote:
> If there's a peace of shit around here that should be flushed, it's only you
> n3tcr4p
> No one like you, get the fuck back on your kiddie mailing list/group.
>
>
>
>
> 2008/12/3 n3td3v <xploitable@...il.com>
>>
>> You're like a shite that won't flush away.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com> wrote:
>> > all speculation:
>> >
>> > no 1 knows 4 sure.
>> >
>> > http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/17/1754257&from=rss
>> >
>> > http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/
>> >
>> > http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/nsa_backdoor_windows.htm
>> >
>> > c how i did that n3td3v?  i posted links, nd talked about the article
>> > w/out stealing ppls work.
>> >
>> > pay attention.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andy McKnight <andy.mcknight@...il.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> 2008/12/2 Ureleet <ureleet@...il.com>
>> >>>
>> >>> u arent getting it.
>> >>>
>> >>> it has nothing 2 do w/ backdoors.  they r talking about actual
>> >>> backdoors in the code.  so that anyone who knows the backdoor can
>> >>> acess any windows system regarless.  they r saying that microsoft has
>> >>> coded backdoors into the system so that the govt can get into any
>> >>> system, patched or not.  pay attention.
>> >>
>> >> I haven't seen anything that suggests that systems are/will be
>> >> backdoored
>> >> here.  The text of the statement said "remote searches" which in legal
>> >> terms
>> >> could be anything from something as simple as browsing shared files
>> >> available through P2P to full remote system access.
>> >>
>> >> Do you have anything else that suggests Windows has backdoors present
>> >> other
>> >> than this statement?
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ