full-disclosure - Re: the real stuxnet authors plz stand up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:30:06 -0700
From: coderman <coderman@...il.com>
To: Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: the real stuxnet authors plz stand up

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:57 PM, coderman <coderman@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM, coderman <coderman@...il.com> wrote:
>> stuxnet is strategic, and misleading...
>
> misleading because the failures induced in target present as
> inefficiencies and mechanical fatigue in centrifuge process...

Qom also hit - the fingerprinting mechanism is essentially mapped to
form and function, rather than specific instance. That is to say, the
Qom centrifuge enrichment deployment is sufficiently similar in
devices and software applied (WinCC, 6ES7-417, 6ES7-315-2, etc.) as to
also fall under precision targeting.

yay full disclosure.

0x04

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/