full-disclosure - Re: Linux kernel exploit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:35:58 +0000
From: Benji <me@...ji.com>
To: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <cal.leeming@...plicitymedialtd.co.uk>
Cc: firebits@...ktrack.com.br, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk,
	leandro lista <leandro_lista@...tari.com.br>,
	Ariel Biener <ariel@...t.tau.ac.il>, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
	full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Linux kernel exploit

it doesnt contribute to testing, i can assure you there's been enough
'tests' of this exploit.

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <
cal.leeming@...plicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote:

> Actually Ryan, I'll think you'll find a lot of people just wanted to
> contribute towards testing, as most authors will appreciate the masses
> testing on as many systems as possible.
>
> It's not a case of anyone "showing off", it's simply that a lot of people
> simply don't have time to read the "small print".
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Ryan Sears <rdsears@....edu> wrote:
>
>> Hey Dan,
>>
>> Freaking THANK YOU first and foremost. I've been waiting for someone to
>> say that for days now, and was just about to myself.
>>
>> Just because everyone and their brother want's to show off that they can
>> compile & run some software (herp a derp, good job) DOESN'T mean they should
>> immediately post it here. I tested it against an OLDER KERNEL on purpose
>> because I actually read the headers and the exploit worked as expected. I
>> knew that this was responsibly disclosed, so it was already patched on any
>> system that I updated. If you don't have the proper symbols, then the
>> exploit doesn't have the proper offsets, and the exploit will fail. Plain
>> and simple. *THEN* there's people who don't even bother to read that "Red
>> Hat does not support Econet by default". DOES NOT. As in the exploit WON'T
>> WORK!
>>
>> It's pathetic that the original exploit dev has to waste his time saying
>> the same thing 5 times.
>>
>> </rant>
>>
>> Ryan Sears
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "dan j rosenberg" <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>
>> To: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <
>> cal.leeming@...plicitymedialtd.co.uk>,
>> full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk, "Ariel Biener" <
>> ariel@...t.tau.ac.il>
>> Cc: "leandro lista" <leandro_lista@...tari.com.br>,
>> firebits@...ktrack.com.br, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
>> full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
>> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 4:08:05 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Linux kernel exploit
>>
>> Please don't inundate me with e-mail because none of you bothered to read
>> the exploit header.
>>
>> The exploit so far has a 100% success rate on the systems it was designed
>> to work on.
>>
>> I don't think this is rocket science.  If your distribution does not
>> compile Econet, then the exploit obviously won't be able to open an Econet
>> socket.  This includes Arch Linux, Gentoo, Fedora, Red Hat, CentOS,
>> Slackware, and more.  This doesn't mean you're not vulnerable, it just means
>> this particular exploit won't work.
>>
>> If your distro doesn't export the relevant symbols (Debian), ditto above.
>>
>> If your distro has patched the Econet vulnerabilities I used to trigger
>> this (Ubuntu), ditto above.
>>
>> This was done on purpose, to avoid giving a weaponized exploit to people
>> who shouldn't have one.
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]"
>>        <cal.leeming@...plicitymedialtd.co.uk>
>> Sender: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
>> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:40:45
>> To: Ariel Biener<ariel@...t.tau.ac.il>
>> Cc: <leandro_lista@...tari.com.br>; <firebits@...ktrack.com.br>; <
>> bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>; <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
>> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Linux kernel exploit
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Cal Leeming
>
> Operational Security & Support Team
>
> *Out of Hours: *+44 (07534) 971120 | *Support Tickets: *
> support@...plicitymedialtd.co.uk
> *Fax: *+44 (02476) 578987 | *Email: *cal.leeming@...plicitymedialtd.co.uk
> *IM: *AIM / ICQ / MSN / Skype (available upon request)
> Simplicity Media Ltd. All rights reserved.
> Registered company number 7143564
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/