| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 18:34:08 -0500 From: Daniel Clemens <daniel.clemens@...ketninjas.net> To: "Ivan ." <ivanhec@...il.com> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: Facebook On May 3, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Ivan . wrote: > it's the law, specifically CALEA > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_Law_Enforcement_Act This is a bit different contextually than the statement made concerning facebook etc. > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Javier Bassi <javierbassi@...il.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Daniel Clemens >> <daniel.clemens@...ketninjas.net> wrote: >>> Prove it! >>> You clearly know nothing about our legal system. >> >> You might find this links interesting >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0aQojDGSD4 >> http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/governmentrequests/ > My point is LEO still has to apply for a title 3 wiretap or a subpoena which is easier since 9/11 but its not as close to the statement that was made. "Google, Yahoo – all these major US organizations have built-in interfaces > > for US intelligence. It’s not a matter of serving a subpoena. They have an > interface that they have developed for US intelligence to use." It really still is a matter of a subpoena, and that is my point. | Daniel Uriah Clemens | Packetninjas L.L.C | | http://www.packetninjas.net | c. 205.567.6850 | | o. 866.267.8851 "Moments of sorrow are moments of sobriety" _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists