lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:42:16 +1100
From: xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com>
To: Robert Kim App and Facebook Marketing <evdo.hsdpa@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Reflection Scan: an Off-Path Attack on TCP

there is a video,and proper PoC's,and yes, theyre not yet public and
this is NOT 100% right either...
maybe, wait abit, i have shown one person only the actual proof of
this and, how it works well, the vid of it.. but, it stays pvt that
was to one FD lister who, can actually keep shit to themselves...and
will repect the fact, that he has it, and, the writer, knows this
also, and, i assume since this has been annoying 30000ppl, coz, 90% of
this list are fkn lamers, seriously, or, why would they continually
fuck this up, and, it only took a LINUX expert, to debug it on both
win and linux :s on win7 actually...so really, i hope when he posts
it, itll shut half of these ppl up and, really, i have madesure one
decent person knows that i dont lie, and, i can promise you now, this
bug is here and works, and has codes for, BUT, the video is ONLY part
available and b. fd doesnt deserve it thru me, since the maker of the
actual pocs is ON this list, i will assume he can see when it is the
right time...to post it but, believe me, it is real.. it just depends
on how it is done.
now, go away.


guy does not explain it right...and, when the person releases the
video to the list, im sure, he will soon...


On 19 January 2012 17:18, Robert Kim App and Facebook Marketing
<evdo.hsdpa@...il.com> wrote:
> Is there a diagram or a video? I'm not a professional IT guy so I'm gunna
> need something of a tutorial! HAHA!
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:22 AM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 18 January 2012 09:45, Jan Wrobel <wrr@...edbit.org> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This TCP session hijacking technique might be of interest to some of
>> > you.
>> >
>> > Abstract:
>> > The paper demonstrates how traffic load of a shared packet queue can
>> > be exploited as a side channel through which protected information
>> > leaks to an off-path attacker. The attacker sends to a victim a
>> > sequence of identical spoofed segments. The victim responds to each
>> > segment in the sequence (the sequence is reflected by the victim) if
>> > the segments satisfy a certain condition tested by the attacker. The
>> > responses do not reach the attacker directly, but induce extra load on
>> > a routing queue shared between the victim and the attacker. Increased
>> > processing time of packets traversing the queue reveal that the tested
>> > condition was true. The paper concentrates on the TCP, but the
>>
>
> -- Robert Q Kim
> High Volume and Digital Printing Company in Seoul
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaWEWl8saHw
> San Diego, CA 92007
> 310 598 1606
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ