lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 21:19:41 +0100
From: Daniël W. Crompton <daniel.crompton@...il.com>
To: Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Cc: cpunks <cypherpunks@...nks.org>,
 Cypherpunks list <cypherpunks@...qaeda.net>,
 Discussion of cryptography and related <cryptography@...dombit.net>
Subject: Re: [cryptography] coderman's keys

As the text looked like a riddle my first guess was that it was a clue to
"just count" which to me sounded like a Caeser or Vigenère cipher with the
date being the key and the quote the obfuscated address. Giving the factors
for generating the keys does sound more logical.

012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234
born on January 31 1979 .. all prime numbers .. I would sit on the floor in
my bedroom and just count.

D.

On 3 November 2013 05:53, Pedro Worcel <pedro@...cel.com> wrote:

> When you import the public key it says this:
>
> hidden@....onion ("born on January 31 1979 .. all prime numbers .. I
> would sit on the floor in my bedroom and just count.")
>
> My guess is that you need those three primes (1 31 1979?) you can somehow
> generate the public key for the hidden service where the mail address is. I
> tried to determine how onion addresses are generated but unfortunately I am
> a noob and I couldn't do it.
>
>
> 2013/11/2 Jeffrey Goldberg <jeffrey@...dmark.org>
>
>> On 2013-10-31, at 11:11 PM, coderman <coderman@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:55 PM, coderman <coderman@...il.com> wrote:
>> >> my contempt for email is well known and reinforced by choice of
>> provider.
>> >>
>> >> there are myriad rebuttals to email as private channel, of which i
>> >> agree fully.  however, if you pass muster, i can be reached via secure
>> >> email.  yes your default client will balk.  this is a feature not a
>> >> bug...  "you must be this high to ride..."
>> >
>> >
>> > still no successful encrypted responses.
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
>> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>>
>> hQMOAyheCGO7e/dQEAv+MonJWg7wyFrbCTJrQ7k4TeG6ue99TGvhZVXouiNS3o4e
>> joZKdq6G7DcnkBrOWbqr6dGoqPUk07HxD4SpxyNV/mm0ns0EjmPiS5AecYAu7Pul
>> YSY2LG7feo5gJdbCheb4l6WqEr+w2/3m14TePwH6pX31l9qaBiWJdpgDBymMVDPA
>> 0mx8AyKp5Evwa1P+R3DVn8P8wQJYbtlhCBlgMwyfQMGnoxRuiivhjxT3gL6PcKQY
>> Zt1S7QTR0QTq45GxNfSuzeZpf/VdsYX1EffHkeDwMV4pzqSaSBOnY5/L+uv/ZI7G
>> x8pBB85xeM7C4NqjdH0fhm9aKeTh6lhn2Ano5xx04HHmj/tCwNPtsH7gChkBs9ud
>> qe8NZmBj+RfKMzwUoSbYxdCLAbc8jziSeweOl9nehgmtfVFCUiEZRi9rt6K2kpll
>> luhGSH7OnXrm+SgTLX8MQc7W+O0ZuOJhkuHabcgl+X5Ig0XiO04FHFwdhXTC3vIz
>> n8YX/vufZSCDu3lsVXhbDACUIoqGEwwY8wJkxCy5NDZpK+r3D+j5jiEzzNdJ8gGH
>> ki9MEIBtD0vfxmjEeeHuTrIKBQPeWygFB8n+sTUw76rx77Fe7b+VvM7YGIpfXf99
>> IUuVbDt9XYG6Xw+pLEn+l7OEPKkuJVvyew72oWUEIErH9afAs+/LRp/GFu2QN/DK
>> 3/Tx+/5SFnzVraYEOWDIYrWB8WCEt9+m8tvl05kU/NNW/yRCOnu454LMp1jBzahd
>> 9/Et37Ak1qKJabBL4iw1p/M8RYHbO5K8083XvS6rGc5M6k0iYyKIwmdfeq8+S/+h
>> x4eZiBCxoE1aMXG3qPZqRl/Z/awJj7cT2YzhX67cVz5DrJJzVUefs6zyclMbBnON
>> ahCpB4D8ll7jy7Iq8cP3v9d+xp+JAqErEIyrdxHrbWwIf+ogKgMwK9H6D7WYyIji
>> lhbTWeUvptooCILO108vRgtxkHMIZ/bpeRjhsIwgqER3C0G+3QYveAlxtqZ8HrQN
>> ZH269bJiVmFTH6GBSMtJTEOFAg4DZhibeqJD/S4QB/9hZut5POE/6gWRV9YmJd8G
>> jjEjbxxhgMZVm4KJDhoMS/b3/UZbdnlx9G6WHech6u/SEI3QQ+fqC8AUIWZfmPZw
>> r+4y71J42TKBuATwAoyw9ooA66aFP+M2bWYehurBhbU00dT+6bxq74ggfJaFgn7v
>> b6Cr6cgODrNlmnxK4Ly95qwHgA5Yt+bbtANhbo/G8W17i6uFxvABu+t+38n6wQPH
>> XXDspJVpcW8NCezyHyd9YLkd2Xx+c2iDWQMGvpdVhVmeJ3ITbU2I5bLBAT6MrN01
>> CnZ0+hYp8ZMCMshfDMFW260nJ6ijVsPBX4LFsSftsNYPitAD4lMNJ73oikXSjHyW
>> B/9C1tbCVTWaS3CMhBPUfWGQGKbFDKtt4jkj64KGkqEMRrnH0KXnfwCK0VDL0XBi
>> WGCvgYHO8N0iqdbge5xDUrfCHTvUv18U8xWaDkzk9Mqp52Idui2DpDEasCCAEUpV
>> EAICDV8tGQZivGoQmQP6K8Pp/05xrm8kDv1xZWjG6wdO5g71aY0KMZqryoJAc68W
>> aXfKfgvokcjQqteQNc+uLPc03WBob5dnwMJqOUQiMIjnKuFRvzoGumm3zQGlZI50
>> 4W0gI9PRLNl4jQJxbGYF2Iv398pMmsbLdC37cx4D5HvHecPlcH5LD0l/Yt/zplar
>> yJiN6gubLtbuSCU0TF3th+7HycAgSJYrW2KzuNWl0QTJwfLJkH+kfbVY7gTB7gkA
>> ZXlUW/Cyzv58A6W5SxjF6OiRmTsmxvP2SWpO1+9uU4gosYJn8qQ7gcHVYTqEjtBH
>> 4XdvdFwDuNISK8IGuqGXOFlbnlTRBmvCYCooAvt+vmj0zl55tzUXhmpOVImY2JKf
>> yQns38JEmSM/dTdlR5zJrcrCUFiSNghGSwLTAFwbQfGRU2P4emZYQ2BMxo4NfF2f
>> XLfynU3muDjG6DhI/ha9JovovXEwT7B1tckoAP2Ns0KO3V8CPBC3tOtZhQETjiuK
>> 1Psu3NE=
>> =ENte
>> -----END PGP MESSAGE-----
>>
>> > let's try an experiment: one bitcoin (~200$USD) to whoever
>> > successfully encrypts a message to my key.
>>
>> That’s a serious sweetener. So I assume that I have misunderstood
>> something about this challenge.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> GPG: http://is.gd/droope <http://is.gd/signature_>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>



-- 
blaze your trail

-- 
Daniël W. Crompton <daniel.crompton@...il.com>

<http://specialbrands.net/>

<http://specialbrands.net/>
http://specialbrands.net/

       <http://twitter.com/webhat>
<http://www.facebook.com/webhat><http://plancast.com/webhat><http://www.linkedin.com/in/redhat>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ