lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 08:07:36 -0400
From: Daniel Wood <daniel.wood@...sp.org>
To: Pedro Ribeiro <pedrib@...il.com>
Cc: "fulldisclosure@...lists.org" <fulldisclosure@...lists.org>
Subject: Re: [FD] So You Like Pain and Vulnerability Management? New Article.

Pedro,

I think you misinterpreted the article.  I can see how his writing style can be confusing with all the joking and contradictions throughout. I had to reread it twice to make sure I was taking away what was intended 

Just to be clear though, I agree and don't think it really adds value for those of us that already do vulnerability management, however, if written clearer, I could see this as being beneficial to those that don't understand VM and to drive away the misconception that VM is just patching and will make you secure. 

One thing I would like to see us get away from as a community is silo'ing VM as something special. I think we need to be more holistic and include threats (TVM) as part of the larger picture. Doing so increases you VM ROI and actually gets you closer to a more secure baseline as you can select appropriate controls (caveat: if done properly). 

Daniel

> On May 13, 2014, at 5:40 AM, Pedro Ribeiro <pedrib@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 12 May 2014 19:48, "Pete Herzog" <lists@...com.org> wrote:
>> 
>> "Hi, I’m your friend and security researcher, Pete Herzog. You might
>> know me from other public service announcements such as the widely
>> anticipated, upcoming workshop Secrets of Security, and critic’s
>> choice award winners: Teaching Your Teen to Hack Police Cars, and
>> Help! My Monkey is Posting Pictures to Facebook!
>> 
>> But I’m here today to take a moment and talk to you about the pain of
>> neglect, isolation, abuse, and infection, better known as
>> “vulnerability management”. In many ways vulnerability management can
>> be part of a healthy system and over-all good security. But there’s
>> many important differences between vulnerability management and
>> security that you should know about:"
>> 
>> That's how my new article starts. 5 points on the pain of
>> vulnerability management and how to make it hurt less. It's posted
>> here:
>> 
>> 
> http://www.tripwire.com/state-of-security/vulnerability-management/so-you-like-pain-and-vulnerability-management/
>> 
>> 
>> Feel free to discuss with me on Twitter @peteherzog and #securitypain
>> and #helpmymonkeyispostingpicturestofacebook ;)
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> -pete.
>> 
>> --
>> Pete Herzog - Managing Director - pete@...com.org
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I fail to see the point of the article and I think you are making some
> major assumptions here while at the same time stating the obvious.
> 
> First, who is the audience of the article? As a vulnerability manager
> myself I find insulting that you think that I don't know that finding
> vulnerabilities by itself without ANY other security controls will make my
> employer "secure".
> 
> Secondly, you are saying that "vulnerability management" = "scanning
> something with a vulnerability scanner, review the output and patch". As it
> says on Wikipedia, it is much more than that - it is the "cyclical practice
> of identifying, classifying, remediating, and mitigating vulnerabilities"
> [¹].
> So at the very least I would define it as identifying possible
> vulnerabilities with various tools - scanners, internal and external
> pentests, source code review, fuzzing, bug reports, etc - and managing
> their life cycle to the end by either patching, putting a control in place
> or even signing it off as an acceptable risk.
> 
> Also you seem to focus solely on the problem of patching closed source
> software. But nowadays most of the attacks are done via the Web layer, and
> in most companies the Web layer is developed in house. So you can much more
> effectively find vulnerabilities with a source code review than just
> patching them as they appear.
> 
> As the article seems to imply, vulnerability management is about reducing
> the risk and the overall attack surface. But I thought this was common
> knowledge, especially among people who consider themselves "vulnerability
> managers"?
> 
> Regards
> Pedro
> 
> [¹] http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulnerability_management
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
> http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
> Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

_______________________________________________
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ