| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:42:28 -0400 From: tytso@....edu To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ext4: don't use quota reservation for speculative metadata blocks On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 05:33:14PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > BTW I'm too familiar with cross-devel-tree process > If tytso@ will get the patchset will you get an quota-related patches > to linux-fs tree too? Otherwise everybody have to wait for ext4-tree > push to linus's tree and when to linux-fs. I've already asked Jan if he would mind my carrying the quota patches in the ext4 tree, since I believe there's less chance of patch collisions with upcoming changes in the quota tree than if they were carried in the quota tree and we had to worry about changes to the ext4 tree. These patches are also low-risk enough (they'll either work or they won't, and it's not hard to desk-check them for correctness) that we could push them to Linus now before the merge window, and see if he's willing to take them. I have some data corruption bugfixes I need to push to Linus anyway.... I dunno if Linus will be willing to take them, but that's the other approach. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists