linux-ext4 - Re: Ping.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:14:50 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	tytso@....edu, adilger@....com, hch@...radead.org, jack@...e.cz,
	david@...morbit.com, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: Ping.

On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:00:58PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org> writes:
> 
> > This is 6'th version of extened inode owner patch-set.
> > Please review it tell me what do you think about all this.
> >  Are you agree with this approach?
> >  Are you worry about some implementation details?
> >  Is it ready for merge to some devel's tree?
> Ping. I haven't got response about the patchset, just small note about
> xattr-name from Andreas.
> Please clarify what do you think about whole idea and
> current patch-set state. What do i have to do to make a progress?

As long as you still have the awkward ifdefs and different semantics for
"isolation" vs "not"  there's still a NACK from me.  But in the end Al
will have to decide if he wants to take your patches or not.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html