linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC v3 01/13] btrfs: add one new mount option '-o hot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:28:42 +0200
From:	David Sterba <dave@...os.cz>
To:	zwu.kernel@...il.com
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxram@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	david@...morbit.com, dave@...os.cz, tytso@....edu, cmm@...ibm.com,
	Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 01/13] btrfs: add one new mount option '-o hot_track'

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 06:07:23PM +0800, zwu.kernel@...il.com wrote:
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> @@ -1726,6 +1726,7 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args {
>  #define BTRFS_MOUNT_CHECK_INTEGRITY	(1 << 20)
>  #define BTRFS_MOUNT_CHECK_INTEGRITY_INCLUDING_EXTENT_DATA (1 << 21)
>  #define BTRFS_MOUNT_PANIC_ON_FATAL_ERROR	(1 << 22)
> +#define BTRFS_MOUNT_HOT_TRACK		(1 << 23)

Please don't forget to add new options to btrfs_show_options(),
otherwise we can't tell what filesystems have hot tracking enabled.

> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> @@ -303,7 +304,7 @@ enum {
>  	Opt_notreelog, Opt_ratio, Opt_flushoncommit, Opt_discard,
>  	Opt_space_cache, Opt_clear_cache, Opt_user_subvol_rm_allowed,
>  	Opt_enospc_debug, Opt_subvolrootid, Opt_defrag, Opt_inode_cache,
> -	Opt_no_space_cache, Opt_recovery, Opt_skip_balance,
> +	Opt_no_space_cache, Opt_recovery, Opt_skip_balance, Opt_hot_track,

Please add the new option to the end.

>  	Opt_check_integrity, Opt_check_integrity_including_extent_data,
>  	Opt_check_integrity_print_mask, Opt_fatal_errors,
>  	Opt_err,
> @@ -342,6 +343,7 @@ static match_table_t tokens = {
>  	{Opt_no_space_cache, "nospace_cache"},
>  	{Opt_recovery, "recovery"},
>  	{Opt_skip_balance, "skip_balance"},
> +	{Opt_hot_track, "hot_track"},

(also this one)

>  	{Opt_check_integrity, "check_int"},
>  	{Opt_check_integrity_including_extent_data, "check_int_data"},
>  	{Opt_check_integrity_print_mask, "check_int_print_mask=%d"},
> @@ -553,6 +555,9 @@ int btrfs_parse_options(struct btrfs_root *root, char *options)
>  		case Opt_skip_balance:
>  			btrfs_set_opt(info->mount_opt, SKIP_BALANCE);
>  			break;
> +		case Opt_hot_track:

It's a common patter in the surrounding code that a message is printed
when enabling options, but the vfs prints its own, so I'm not sure if
it's needed here as well. Just thinking, leave it as it is now.

> +			btrfs_set_opt(info->mount_opt, HOT_TRACK);
> +			break;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY
>  		case Opt_check_integrity_including_extent_data:
>  			printk(KERN_INFO "btrfs: enabling check integrity"

david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html