| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:57:17 +0100 (CET) From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] xfstests: Create single function for testing xfs_io commands On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:44:20 -0800 > From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> > To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> > Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] xfstests: Create single function for testing > xfs_io commands > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 04:51:32PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > Currently there are several function testing various xfs_io commands. > > This commit creates _require_xfs_io_command() to test any xfs_command. > > Looks good. Do you plan to keep the wrappers around > _require_xfs_io_command in the long run or just for a transitional > period? I didn't really want to go back and change all the callers, but it can be done eventually. I do not have any strong opinions either way. > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> Thanks! -Lukas > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists