[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 08:24:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: tytso@....edu, mchan@...adcom.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt DO NOT APPLY] Fix for tg3 networking lockup
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, David Miller wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 01:34:56 -0400 (EDT)
>
> > My suggestion would be to separate that tg3_timer into 4 different
> > timers, which is what it actually looks like.
>
> Timers have non-trivial cost. It's cheaper to have one and
> vector off to the necessary operations each tick internalls.
>
> That's why it's implemented as one timer.
>
hrtimers don't have the cost of a normal timer. And that's why I suggested
to convert them. There's a much bigger cost in a single timer that always
times out than 3 hrtimers. hrtimers are expected to timeout, but timers
are not.
Of the 4 timers, only one is a timeout. The other three expire every time,
forcing the timer wheel into effect. Even though it's one timer
implementing 4, it's expensive to use it as a watchdog.
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists