[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 02:26:43 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
CC: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>,
"Shai Fultheim (Shai@...lex86.org)" <shai@...lex86.org>,
pravin b shelar <pravin.shelar@...softinc.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] NUMA futex hashing
Nick Piggin wrote:
> No we shouldn't slow them down. I'd be interested to see whether
> locking is significantly sped up with this new data structure,
> though.
OTOH, maybe you don't need a new data structure. Maybe you could
use the hash and check that for a match on a private futex before
trying to find a possible shared futex.
Locking I guess becomes no more of a problem than now, and in some
cases maybe much less. So OK, I stand corrected.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists