linux-kernel - i386 PDA patches use of %gs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:35:40 +0200
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	akpm@...l.org, ak@...e.de, mingo@...e.hu,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: i386 PDA patches use of %gs

Hi,

Userspace uses %gs for it's per thread data (and in modern linux
versions that means "all the time", errno is there for example).

On x86-64 this is the reason that the kernel uses the OTHER segment
register; so for the PDA patches this would mean using %fs and not %gs.

The advantage of this is very simple: %fs will be 0 for userspace most
of the time. Putting 0 in a segment register is cheap for the cpu,
putting anything else in is quite expensive (a LOT of security checks
need to happen). As such I would MUCH rather see that the i386 PDA
patches use %fs and not %gs... 

Jeremy, is there a reason you're specifically using %gs and not %fs? If
not, would you mind a switch to using %fs instead?

Greetings,
   Arjan van de Ven
-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/