linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:30:02 +0100
From:	Jörn Engel <joern@...nheim.fh-wedel.de>
To:	Holden Karau <holdenk@...dros.com>
Cc:	Josef Sipek <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>,
	hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"akpm@...l.org" <akpm@...l.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	holden@...scanfly.ca, holden.karau@...il.com,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised

On Tue, 31 October 2006 10:03:08 -0500, Holden Karau wrote:
> +static int fat_mirror_bhs_optw(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head **bhs,
> +			       int nr_bhs , int wait)
>  {
>  	struct msdos_sb_info *sbi = MSDOS_SB(sb);
> -	struct buffer_head *c_bh;
> +	struct buffer_head *c_bh[nr_bhs*(sbi->fats)];

Variable-sized array on the kernel-stack?  That can easily explode in
your hands.  Unless you are _very_ sure about the bounds, you should
do an explicit kmalloc.  And if you were that sure, you could just as
well have an array with fixed size.

> +	if (sb->s_flags & MS_SYNCHRONOUS ) 
[...]
> +		}	
[...]
> +				 int nr_bhs ) 

Trailing whitespace in those lines.

Jörn

-- 
Prosperity makes friends, adversity tries them.
-- Publilius Syrus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/