linux-kernel - Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:33:14 -0600
From:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To:	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
CC:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, vatsa@...ibm.com, dev@...nvz.org,
	sekharan@...ibm.com, menage@...gle.com,
	ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, balbir@...ibm.com,
	haveblue@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	matthltc@...ibm.com, dipankar@...ibm.com, rohitseth@...gle.com,
	devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices

Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Paul Jackson wrote:

> I agree, but you've cut some importaint questions away,
> so I ask them again:
> 
>  > What if if user creates a controller (configfs directory)
>  > and doesn't remove it at all. Should controller stay in
>  > memory even if nobody uses it?
> 
> This is importaint to solve now - wether we want or not to
> keep "empty" beancounters in memory. If we do not then configfs
> usage is not acceptible.

I can certainly see scenarios where we would want to keep "empty" 
beancounters around.

For instance, I move all the tasks out of a group but still want to be 
able to obtain stats on how much cpu time the group has used.

Maybe we can do that without persisting the actual beancounters...I'm 
not familiar enough with the code to say.

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/