linux-kernel - Does this scsi error storm mean anything to anyone ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 May 2007 18:22:01 +0200
From:	Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>
To:	"Hack inc." <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Does this scsi error storm mean anything to anyone ?

I have a 7.5Gb Fibrenetix VP-1252-U4 connected to an IBM x3550 through
an Adaptec ASC-29320ALP U320.  I've been having good luck with these
raids as long as I force the accesses to be in U160 mode.  In U320, DV
fails.

Well, not this time.  When udev starts, all hell breaks loose.

The raid is split in 2T/2T/2T/1.5T.  The "no partition table" is
normal, I haven't written to this raid yet.

Kernel is a fedora 5 one with an unrelated patch to fix an autofs race
condition (hence the 'b').  Anyone recognises anything?

  OG.

View attachment "r" of type "text/plain" (69760 bytes)

View attachment "s" of type "text/plain" (2766 bytes)