lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 17 Nov 2007 08:02:38 -0600
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To:	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
CC:	gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Add a private_data pointer to struct device_attribute

Mikael Pettersson wrote:

> A common trick is to embed a generic struct inside a specific one
> containing add-on data fields, and then to map from the generic
> one to the specific one using container_of() in your ops (function
> pointers). This is both faster and less wasteful of memory than
> adding void *private all over the place.
> 
> Any reason that won't work here?

Yes, that will work.  Sorry, I should have thought of that myself, since I've 
used that trick a number of times before.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ