linux-kernel - Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] 2.6.25 regression: VIDEO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:49:12 -0200
From:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
To:	Trent Piepho <xyzzy@...akeasy.org>
Cc:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
	v4l-dvb-maintainer@...uxtv.org,
	Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] 2.6.25 regression: VIDEO_DEV=y/m,	I2C=n
 compile error

> Maybe the kernel headers should provide a couple macros for testing
> configs, since people get it wrong over and over again?
> 
> #define CONFIG_ON(x) (defined(CONFIG_##x) || defined(CONFIG_##x##_MODULE))
> #define CONFIG_AVAIABLE(x) (defined(CONFIG_##x) || (defined(MODULE) && defined(CONFIG_##x##_MODULE)))

Seems a good idea to me.
> 
> Not sure what to do about VIDEO_DEV=y, I2C=m.  It should be possible except
> for this function.

I don't see much sense on allowing v4l2-common being in-kernel, while having
I2C as module. Also, creating a separate module for just a single function
seems to be overkill.

IMO, in this specific case, v4l2-common should also be a module. Not sure,
however,the better syntax on Kconfig. Once, someone suggested a very weird
syntax, like:

	depends on I2C if I2C


Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/