linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] DS1WM: decouple host IRQ and INTR active state settings.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:01:59 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"pHilipp Zabel" <philipp.zabel@...il.com>
Cc:	"Matt Reimer" <mreimer@...p.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	johnpol@....mipt.ru, szabolcs.gyurko@....hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DS1WM: decouple host IRQ and INTR active state
 settings.

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:35:14 +0100 "pHilipp Zabel" <philipp.zabel@...il.com> wrote:

> > Guys, I'm thinking that by the time we actually need this patch in the
> > mainline tree, it may well be obsolete.  So I should drop the copy I have?
> 
> I obviously think it should be applied.
> But if you prefer that I resend once it is actually needed by
> something in the tree, I'll happily do that, too.
> The PASIC2/3 mfd driver is currently waiting for something like Dmitry
> Baryshkov's clocklib patches to go in.

Well.  It's a very small patch - I'm not particularly fussed either way.
As long as you gus are sure it's safe and will be useful then I guess we
can proceed with it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/