linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] DS1WM: decouple host IRQ and INTR active state settings.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 06 Feb 2008 10:19:20 -0800
From:	Matt Reimer <mreimer@...p.net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, johnpol@....mipt.ru,
	szabolcs.gyurko@....hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DS1WM: decouple host IRQ and INTR active state
	settings.

On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 10:01 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:35:14 +0100 "pHilipp Zabel" <philipp.zabel@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Guys, I'm thinking that by the time we actually need this patch in the
> > > mainline tree, it may well be obsolete.  So I should drop the copy I have?
> > 
> > I obviously think it should be applied.
> > But if you prefer that I resend once it is actually needed by
> > something in the tree, I'll happily do that, too.
> > The PASIC2/3 mfd driver is currently waiting for something like Dmitry
> > Baryshkov's clocklib patches to go in.
> 
> Well.  It's a very small patch - I'm not particularly fussed either way.
> As long as you gus are sure it's safe and will be useful then I guess we
> can proceed with it?

I agree with Philipp, and think it should go in.

Matt

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/