linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] xtime_lock vs update_process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:29:54 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	rth <rth@...ddle.net>, "bryan.wu" <bryan.wu@...log.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, gerg@...inux.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xtime_lock vs update_process_times

On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:33:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Subject: xtime_lock vs update_process_times
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> 
> ( repost from: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/28/101 )
> 
> Commit: d3d74453c34f8fd87674a8cf5b8a327c68f22e99
> Subject: hrtimer: fixup the HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE_NO_SOFTIRQ fallback
> 
> Broke several archs, since only Russel bothered to merge the fix,
> and Greg to ACK his arch, I'm sending this for merger.
> 
> I have confirmation that the Alpha bit results in a booting kernel.
> That leaves: blackfin, frv, sh and sparc untested.
> 
> The deadlock in question was found by Russell:
> 
>   IRQ handle 
>     -> timer_tick() - xtime seqlock held for write
>       -> update_process_times() 
>         -> run_local_timers()
>           -> hrtimer_run_queues()
>             -> hrtimer_get_softirq_time() - tries to get a read lock
> 
> Now, Thomas assures me the fix is trivial, only do_timer() needs to be
> done under the xtime_lock, and update_process_times() can savely be removed
> from under it.
> 
The SH bits also work fine. I've already merged that part in to my tree.
Thanks, Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/