linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation optimization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 07 May 2008 13:12:14 +0800
From:	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	dean gaudet <dean@...tic.org>
Cc:	Sebastian Siewior <linux-crypto@...breakpoint.cc>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"Adam J. Richter" <adam@...drasil.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation optimization

Hi,

On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 23:25 -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
> one of the more important details in evaluating these changes would be the 
> family/model/stepping of the processors being microbenchmarked... could 
> you folks include /proc/cpuinfo with the results?

The file attached is /proc/cpuinfo of my testing machine.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying

> also -- please drop the #define for R16 to %rsp ... it obfuscates more 
> than it helps anything.
> 
> thanks
> -dean
> 
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> 
> > * Huang, Ying | 2008-04-25 11:11:17 [+0800]:
> > 
> > >Hi, Sebastian,
> > Hi Huang,
> > 
> > sorry for the delay.
> > 
> > >I changed the patches to group the read or write together instead of
> > >interleaving. Can you help me to test these new patches? The new patches
> > >is attached with the mail.
> > The new results are attached.
> > 
> > >
> > >Best Regards,
> > >Huang Ying
> > 
> > Sebastian
> > 

View attachment "cpuinfo" of type "text/plain" (1374 bytes)