linux-kernel - Re: TASK_WAKEKILL && /sbin/init (was: [PATCH 1/2] schedule: fix TASK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 5 Jun 2008 20:16:12 +0400
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TASK_WAKEKILL && /sbin/init (was: [PATCH 1/2] schedule: fix TASK_WAKEKILL vs SIGKILL race)

On 06/05, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Anyway. How about the (untested/uncompiled) patch for now? -EINTR or
> -ERESTARTNOINTR looks "more correct" regardless.
> 
> Oleg.
> 
> --- mm/filemap.c
> +++ mm/filemap.c
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int sync_page(void *word)
>  static int sync_page_killable(void *word)
>  {
>  	sync_page(word);
> -	return fatal_signal_pending(current) ? -EINTR : 0;
> +	return fatal_signal_pending(current) ? -ERESTARTNOINTR : 0;

Forgot to mention, this part is questionable of course. And it can't
prevent the case when "ret = sys_read(count)" succeeds, but ret < count.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/