linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] power: support for Texas Instruments BQ27x00 battery managers.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:28:53 +0400
From:	Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
To:	Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: support for Texas Instruments BQ27x00 battery
	managers.

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:03:54PM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> Sorry for the long delay... I was very busy in these days! :'(

No problem. ;-)

> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:38:17AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> 
> > Here is the patch to show the idea. I only tested it to build, so no
> > guaranties that it will work on the actual hardware. :-)
> > 
> > This patch should be separated: one patch is for I2C subsystem
> > maintainer (drivers/i2c/* changes) and another (drivers/power/* +
> > include/linux/bq27x00.h) is for me.
> 
> On my system I need to specify 2 battery chips into the platform
> specific file as follow (file is arch/arm/mach-pxa/wr1100.c):
> 
> 	static struct i2c_board_info __initdata wr1100_i2c_mux_devices[] = {
> 	        {
> 	                I2C_BOARD_INFO("bq27200", 0x55),
> 	        },
> 	};
> 		
>         i2c_register_board_info(2, wr1100_i2c_mux_devices,
>                                         ARRAY_SIZE(wr1100_i2c_mux_devices));
>         i2c_register_board_info(3, wr1100_i2c_mux_devices,
>                                         ARRAY_SIZE(wr1100_i2c_mux_devices));
> 
> By using your solution I cannot use this code, is that right?

Why not? I think there should be no problem.

[...]
> if you agree, I prefere resend my
> patch without the #ifdef and the w1 support (since I cannot test it at
> all) but living the possibility to add that support later.

Yes, that would be also fine.

Thanks,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/