linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] power: support for Texas Instruments BQ27x00 battery managers.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:26:43 +0200
From:	Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
To:	Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: support for Texas Instruments BQ27x00 battery
	managers.

On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:28:53PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:38:17AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > 
> > > Here is the patch to show the idea. I only tested it to build, so no
> > > guaranties that it will work on the actual hardware. :-)
> > > 
> > > This patch should be separated: one patch is for I2C subsystem
> > > maintainer (drivers/i2c/* changes) and another (drivers/power/* +
> > > include/linux/bq27x00.h) is for me.
> > 
> > On my system I need to specify 2 battery chips into the platform
> > specific file as follow (file is arch/arm/mach-pxa/wr1100.c):
> > 
> > 	static struct i2c_board_info __initdata wr1100_i2c_mux_devices[] = {
> > 	        {
> > 	                I2C_BOARD_INFO("bq27200", 0x55),
> > 	        },
> > 	};
> > 		
> >         i2c_register_board_info(2, wr1100_i2c_mux_devices,
> >                                         ARRAY_SIZE(wr1100_i2c_mux_devices));
> >         i2c_register_board_info(3, wr1100_i2c_mux_devices,
> >                                         ARRAY_SIZE(wr1100_i2c_mux_devices));
> > 
> > By using your solution I cannot use this code, is that right?
> 
> Why not? I think there should be no problem.

The platform_driver_register() conflicts with i2c_add_driver(),
doesn't it? O_o

> [...]
> > if you agree, I prefere resend my
> > patch without the #ifdef and the w1 support (since I cannot test it at
> > all) but living the possibility to add that support later.
> 
> Yes, that would be also fine.

Ok, since I cannot test the w1 subsystem at all, is better I provide
only tested code. :)

Ciao,

Rodolfo

-- 

GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail: giometti@...eenne.com
Linux Device Driver                          giometti@...ux.it
Embedded Systems                     phone:  +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming                     skype:  rodolfo.giometti
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/