linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] smackfs: check for allocation failures in smk_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:03:03 -0800
From:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To:	Sergio Luis <sergio@...ces.uece.br>
CC:	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>,
	LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKLM <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smackfs: check for allocation failures in smk_set_access()

Sergio Luis wrote:
>  smackfs: check for allocation failures in smk_set_access() 
>
>  While adding a new subject/object pair to smack_list, smk_set_access()
>  didn't check the return of kzalloc(). 
>
>  This patch changes smk_set_access() to return 0 or -ENOMEM, based on 
>  kzalloc()'s return. It also updates its caller, smk_write_load(), to
>  check for smk_set_access()'s return, given it is no longer a void 
>  return function.
>
>  Signed-off-by: Sergio Luis <sergio@...ces.uece.br>
>  To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
>  Cc: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish.07@...il.com>
>  Cc: LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
>  Cc: LKLM <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
>   

Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>


>  security/smack/smackfs.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++----
>  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/smack/smackfs.c b/security/smack/smackfs.c
> index c21d8c8..44eb933 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smackfs.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smackfs.c
> @@ -185,11 +185,15 @@ static int smk_open_load(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>   * the subject/object pair and replaces the access that was
>   * there. If the pair isn't found add it with the specified
>   * access.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 if nothing goes wrong or -ENOMEM if it fails
> + * during the allocation of the new pair to add.
>   */
> -static void smk_set_access(struct smack_rule *srp)
> +static int smk_set_access(struct smack_rule *srp)
>  {
>  	struct smk_list_entry *sp;
>  	struct smk_list_entry *newp;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&smack_list_lock);
>  
> @@ -202,14 +206,20 @@ static void smk_set_access(struct smack_rule *srp)
>  
>  	if (sp == NULL) {
>  		newp = kzalloc(sizeof(struct smk_list_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (newp == NULL) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +
>  		newp->smk_rule = *srp;
>  		newp->smk_next = smack_list;
>  		smack_list = newp;
>  	}
>  
> +out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&smack_list_lock);
>  
> -	return;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -309,8 +319,10 @@ static ssize_t smk_write_load(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	smk_set_access(&rule);
> -	rc = count;
> +	rc = smk_set_access(&rule);
> +
> +	if (!rc)
> +		rc = count;
>  
>  out:
>  	kfree(data);
>
>
>   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/