lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:09:08 -0800
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
	Steve Brokenshire <sbrokenshire@...tia.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Compress kernel modules on installation.

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:04:16 +0100
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 08:50:34PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > 
> > On Friday 2008-12-26 20:48, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >> >> 
> > >> >> This patch allows kernel modules to be compressed when 'make
> > >> >> modules_install' is run after being copied to
> > >> >> the /lib/module/<version>/<...> directory which is useful if
> > >> >> you have module-init-tools installed with --enable-zlib. This
> > >> >> patch adds an option (MODULE_COMPRESS) to the kernel
> > >> >> configuration file (specifically init/Kconfig) so that the
> > >> >> kernel modules will compressed if MODULE_COMPRESS is set.
> > >> 
> > >> I recently started compressing my kernel modules and that saved
> > >> me at least 70 MB of disk space on mostlyallmodconfig.
> > >> (And no, the argument of disks being cheap is not so true with
> > >> CF or SSD.)
> > >> Distro is lazy and wants to wait for upstream to have it,
> > >> so is there any chance of getting this proposal in?
> > >
> > >Steve said he wanted to try to make the solution more
> > >scalable so I am awaiting a new patch.
> > 
> > Hm, all I needed was this patch. It might fire up some people,
> > but it's got all the scalability I could think of..
>  
> Can I ask you to redo this patch.
> I want a way to swith off compression, but it should default be
> enable. So if KBUILD_MODULE_NOCOMPRESS is undefined we will compress
> the modules when we install them.
> 

especially since the decompression is an option for the module tools,
it should be an option for the kernel... 
since it does add a dependency for the module tools (and one that you
might not need; for example I disabled it just to remove a build
requires)


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ